<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.aminn.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>Press Room</title>
 <link>http://www.aminn.org/press-room</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>AIPR and Other Major Stakeholders Comment on Three-Tracks Patent Examination Proposal</title>
 <link>http://www.aminn.org/aipr-and-other-major-stakeholders-comment-three-tracks-patent-examination-proposal</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;American Innovators for Patent Reform Supports Three-Track Patent Examination and Proposes Three-Tier Patent System&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aminn.org/aipr-and-other-major-stakeholders-comment-three-tracks-patent-examination-proposal&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.aminn.org/site/press-room">Press Room</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:25:07 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2237 at http://www.aminn.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title> Gerry Elman, AIPR Member, Pens Incisive Analysis of the Bilski Decision</title>
 <link>http://www.aminn.org/gerry-elman-aipr-member-pens-incisive-analysis-bilski-decision</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;July 1, 2010 - The Supreme Court used &lt;em&gt;Bilski v. Kappos&lt;/em&gt; to effectively &quot;hit reset.&quot; So where does patentability go from here?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AIPR member Gerry J. Elman has co-authored an article with Jerome R. Smith, Jr. called &lt;a href=&quot;http://elman.com/2010/06/bilskireport-elman-smith/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&quot;What Kinds of Inventive Processes Are Patentable?&quot;&lt;/a&gt; The article details the background of the case and speculates about the effect of the Supreme Court&#039;s &lt;em&gt;Bilski&lt;/em&gt; decision on patentability.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aminn.org/gerry-elman-aipr-member-pens-incisive-analysis-bilski-decision&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.aminn.org/site/press-room">Press Room</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 09:30:09 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2236 at http://www.aminn.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pat Choate, IP Expert and AIPR Board Member, Details 9 USPTO Needs Not Addressed by Patent Reform</title>
 <link>http://www.aminn.org/pat-choate-ip-expert-and-aipr-board-member-details-9-uspto-needs-not-addressed-patent-reform</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;June 22, 2010 - A recent article in BNA&#039;s &lt;em&gt;Patent, Trademark and Copyright Journal&lt;/em&gt; called &quot;Rush to Pass Patent Reform This Year Questioned When PTO Reform Missing&quot; sets forth nine crucial reforms that AIPR board member Pat Choate says are absent from patent reform bills currently before the U.S. House and Senate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aminn.org/pat-choate-ip-expert-and-aipr-board-member-details-9-uspto-needs-not-addressed-patent-reform&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.aminn.org/site/press-room">Press Room</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:21:20 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2235 at http://www.aminn.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>In Washington Times OpEd, Alexander Poltorak Criticizes Proposed Patent Reform and Proposes Multi-Tier Patent System</title>
 <link>http://www.aminn.org/washington-times-oped-alexander-poltorak-criticizes-proposed-patent-reform-and-proposes-multi-tier-p</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;New York − May 25, 2010 − Writing in today’s edition of the &lt;em&gt;Washington Times&lt;/em&gt; in an OpEd titled &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/25/patent-reform-misses-the-mark/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;“Patent Reform Misses the Mark,”&lt;/a&gt; Alexander Poltorak, president of American Innovators for Patent Reform, and chairman and CEO of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.generalpatent.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;General Patent Corporation&lt;/a&gt;, criticizes the Patent Reform Act of 2010 and proposes a multi-tier patent system to encourage innovation and job creation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aminn.org/washington-times-oped-alexander-poltorak-criticizes-proposed-patent-reform-and-proposes-multi-tier-p&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.aminn.org/site/press-room">Press Room</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 12:13:40 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1687 at http://www.aminn.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New Group Forms to Oppose Patent Reform </title>
 <link>http://www.aminn.org/new-group-forms-oppose-patent-reform</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;May 6, 2010 - A new advocacy group, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fairpatentreformnv.com/index.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Nevadans for Fair Patent Reform&lt;/a&gt;, recently formed to protest Senate Bill 515 and House Resolution 1260. The group&#039;s website states that the proposed patent reform legislation, if passed into law, would &quot;negatively impact innovation and entrepreneurial activity in Nevada.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aminn.org/new-group-forms-oppose-patent-reform&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.aminn.org/site/press-room">Press Room</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 09:23:05 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1373 at http://www.aminn.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Senate Judiciary Committee Reaches Compromise Agreement on Patent Reform Bill (S.515)</title>
 <link>http://www.aminn.org/senate-judiciary-committee-reaches-compromise-agreement-patent-reform-bill-s-515</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;April 29, 2010 - Patrick Leahy (D-VT), the Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman, came to an agreement with the committee&#039;s ranking Republican, Jeff Sessions (R-AL), on a compromise bill - making passage of the Patent Reform Act of 2009 likely this year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Senate bill, S.515, increases the &quot;gatekeeping&quot; role of judges in determining whether claims of damages are well-founded. Other major changes included in the bill are a change from a first-to-invent to a first-to-file system, and the creation of a system of post-grant review to determine patent validity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aminn.org/senate-judiciary-committee-reaches-compromise-agreement-patent-reform-bill-s-515&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.aminn.org/site/press-room">Press Room</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:35:37 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1298 at http://www.aminn.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IP Advocate Founder Settles Suit with University of Georgia Research Foundation</title>
 <link>http://www.aminn.org/ip-advocate-founder-settles-suit-university-georgia-research-foundation</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;April 27, 2010 - Dr. Renee Kaswan, the founder of IP Advocate, a friend of AIPR and opponent of the patent reform legislation currently before Congress, announced in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketwatch.com/story/ip-advocate-founder-settles-lawsuit-with-university-of-georgia-research-foundation-2010-04-21?reflink=MW_news_stmp&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;press release&lt;/a&gt; that she has settled her seven-year lawsuit with the University of Georgia Research Foundation (UGARF). Dr. Kaswan is a former University of Georgia Veterinary Ophthalmology professor and founder of Georgia Veterinary Specialists.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aminn.org/ip-advocate-founder-settles-suit-university-georgia-research-foundation&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.aminn.org/site/press-room">Press Room</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:17:44 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1299 at http://www.aminn.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>AIPR Founder and President Quoted in National Law Journal</title>
 <link>http://www.aminn.org/aipr-founder-and-president-quoted-national-law-journal</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;April 22, 2010 - Alexander Poltorak, the founder and President of American Innovators for Patent Reform (AIPR) as well as the Chairman and CEO of General Patent Corporation, was quoted extensively in a &lt;em&gt;National Law Journal&lt;/em&gt; article about the Patent Reform Act of 2009. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regarding some of the changes proposed in this legislation, he said &quot;post-grant opposition will be yet another way to diminish patent rights and make patents unenforceable and hurt innovation.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aminn.org/aipr-founder-and-president-quoted-national-law-journal&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.aminn.org/site/press-room">Press Room</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:38:02 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1375 at http://www.aminn.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New Amendment to Senate Patent Reform Bill Meets with Resistance</title>
 <link>http://www.aminn.org/new-amendment-senate-patent-reform-bill-meets-resistance</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;March 15, 2010 - Earlier this month, Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont) &lt;a href=&quot;http://leahy.senate.gov/press/press_releases/release/?id=8b0f5bb3-121b-484a-b0b7-092d7bdee1ac&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;announced in a press release&lt;/a&gt; that the Senate Judiciary Committee has reached a bipartisan agreement and produced an amendment with compromises designed to make the bill ready for a Senate vote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This compromise may not be everything that everyone wants,&quot; acknowledged Leahy, &quot;but it makes important reforms to the outdated patent system.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aminn.org/new-amendment-senate-patent-reform-bill-meets-resistance&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.aminn.org/site/press-room">Press Room</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:54:20 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">748 at http://www.aminn.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Point/Counterpoint: Do you support patent reform?</title>
 <link>http://www.aminn.org/point-counterpoint-do-you-support-patent-reform</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;March 10, 2010 - A new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=223300199&amp;amp;pgno=3&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;feature&lt;/a&gt; by EETimes presents both sides of the patent reform argument. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pat Choate, a member of the AIPR &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aminn.org/board-directors&quot;&gt;Board of Directors&lt;/a&gt;, discusses why the amended Senate patent bill (S. 515) and its House companion (H.R. 1260) have the potential to make patent infringement easier and less costly while weakening issued patents.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aminn.org/point-counterpoint-do-you-support-patent-reform&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.aminn.org/site/press-room">Press Room</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:46:06 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">660 at http://www.aminn.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
